| |
|
| |
News & Blog |
| |
01 May
2011 |
Previously, to assist in counterbalancing the pitch and roll moments of the boat, our design included an outrigger located behind the wing-sails to seat an additional crew member whose weight can be positioned on either outrigger float, depending on which tack the boat is on. This configuration with two crew members, one pilot and one acting as |
|
counterbalance, has been improved upon by replacing the additional crew member with a moving mass located within the fixed outrigger structure that can be controlled by the pilot. This change simplifies the design, increases safety and reduces drag.
Scott |
|
| |
|
|
01 March
2011 |
You may have noticed a slight name change to ‘v-44’ along with some changes to the layout of the boat. Firstly, the change to ‘v-44’ is simply to reflect the fact that the overall length has increased to 44’. We have developed a new main hull configuration where the entire hull remains upright (as opposed to only the forward section). This new hull layout has a cockpit located behind the wing-sails, above the waterline. The hull has an increased slenderness ratio and since it remains upright, it now has a more classical shape for low wave drag. The two wing-sails and keels are rigidly connected through the hull centre section. The pilot retracts a fairing which covers this section, allowing the wing-sails and keels to rotate through 90 degrees as the boat tacks.
A second crew member will be stationed on the windward outrigger of two additional fixed outriggers. The second crew member / fixed outrigger combination will assist with the tacking process and benefit the overall boat centre of gravity position. The cross member supporting the two fixed outriggers is streamlined. Two full length trailing edge flaps acting as ailerons have been introduced to the cross member to give an additional rolling moment boost (opposing the heeling moment from the vertical wing-sail). This additional moment will increase with speed and compensates the increasing heeling moment as the boat rides higher at high speed.
|
|
Performance wise, we have reduced the loading on the keel and relaxed the target lift/drag ratio of the boat to 2.3:1 to allow us to push the VNE (velocity not to exceed) to 70 knots. This will necessitate a 30 knot wind. Recent changes to the boat’s layout have enabled us to ride higher, above larger waves, and yet still maintain overall roll balance of the v-44.
Our progress with Coupled CFD and Structural Analysis of the v-44 has gone up a gear, since the VERNEY Speed Sailing Project is now the proud owner of a Cluster. Our dedicated Cluster comprises of 24 compute nodes and will allow up to a 150 million cell CFD mesh.
Finally, we will be presenting our work at this year’s Simulia Customer Conference in Barcelona, Spain, during 17 – 19 May. Steve Howell will also be presenting at the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Developments in Marine CFD conference in London, UK, during 22 – 23 March.
Tim |
|
| |
|
|
| |
30 October
2010 |
Steve Howell has recently joined the team as CFD lead and will be carrying forward the great work currently being carried out by Igor, Konstantin and Tomasz at Capvidia. We have also gained a new sponsor, Prospect Flow Solutions, who are an engineering design and analysis provider to the world energy industries. Prospect is the perfect company to have on board as a technology sponsor, no matter where they are based in the world - they just happened to be headquartered down the road from us in Aberdeen, Scotland. In fact, I believe that Aberdeen is probably one of the best places in the world for us to be based – just a long way from Portland!
Steve, Scott and I met up in Portland during Weymouth speed week this October. The task was to understand better the layout and conditions of the inner and outer harbour areas ready for our record attempt..
We are currently focussed on carrying out CFD analyses of the aero- and hydro-dynamics of the boat using FlowVision HPC from Capvidia and Abaqus from Dassault Systemes Simulia. For the above-surface aerodynamics, each fluid structure interaction (FSI) analysis couples Abaqus with FlowVision and involves capturing the movement of six independently rotating surfaces (four wing-sail planks and two outriggers) at different speeds across the boat’s speed range. This process helps us to tune the control system and allows us to virtually test sail the boat before it is constructed.
We are also carrying out detailed tuning of the carbon
fibre and titanium keel using xfoil and Abaqus.
Tim
|
|
|
|
Steve, Scott and Tim at Portland during Weymouth Speed Week, October 2010
|
|
Predicted velocity vectors and pressure distribution at 40 kts boat speed |
| |
|
|
|
| |
15 June
2010 |
Here’s me at the Simulia Customer Conference this May in Providence, along with about 400 other attendees! I presented my paper which was included in the Conference proceedings ‘Preliminary design of a composite wing-sail’. The paper gave a good general introduction to the Albatross project, before going into the details of the wing-sail design and how we have achieved a wing shaped structure which mimics the characteristics of a purely tubular structure centred at the axis of rotation. After perhaps the first 10 seconds of stage fright, I very much enjoyed giving the presentation which is always a good sign. I got good feed-back and I have come away from the experience with a new sponsor for the project, Tomasz Luniewski who runs Capvidia http://www.capvidia.com/ cfd-simulation They are supporting the project in the area of CFD and Multiphysics simulations. We will have access to their latest generation CFD software, FlowVision HPC along with their assistance along the way, including helping us with access to some serious computing power. Some more great news too; we are now sponsored by Dassault Systemes under their Passion for Innovation scheme http://www.3ds.com/company/passion-for-innovation/program/ Dassault Systemes are the parent company of both Simulia and SolidWorks. Tim |
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
| |
25 April
2010 |
The final version of our paper 'Preliminary Design of a Composite Wingsail' has been approved by Dassault Systemes Simulia and will be included in the Simulia Customer Conference 2010 proceedings. |
|
I will be flying out to Providence to present our paper May 25-27 http://www.simulia.com/events/conf_10_customer_papers.html
- Tim |
|
| |
|
 |
|
| |
28 January
2010 |
Wire bracing was added to the secondary structure and structural foam was added to bulk out the trailing edge spar. Skins were added to the model and the aero loads applied to the skin (as opposed to directly to the main spar as with the previous analyses).
The skins are a composite of structural foam and Mylar. This is modelled in Abaqus using a composite layup. Tension was applied to the Mylar layer by applying a temperature predefined field and including an expansion (contraction) step.
We were very pleased that this worked well! It will enable us (in the detailed design phase) to optimise the wing skins to give a good balance between weight and rigidity. We will be able to play around with the foam density, thickness, Mylar weight and tension to minimise the distortion of the aerofoil under local aero loading, whilst saving on weight. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|

|
|
| |
09 January
2010 |
The chosen aerodynamic design for the wingsail makes it necessary for the wingsail structure to have the same flexural stiffness in all directions, therefore mimicking a purely tubular structure. This is to ensure that there are no tendencies for the wing panels to rotate under unwanted structural influences.
After adding the secondary geometry to the main spar our results show that the direction of displacement remains the same as the direction of applied load. This is great. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
| |
14 December
2009 |
We have received a provisional acceptance of a paper for publication in the 2010 SIMULIA Customer Conference Proceedings and for presentation at the conference during May 24-27, 2010. |
|
The paper will detail the Abaqus based FEA study of the wingsail structure. |
|
| |
|
 |
|
| |
04 December
2009 |
A macroscopic FEA simulation of the carbon fibre composite wingsail main spar gave us our first indication that the mass budget for the wingsails is going to be achievable. The mass budget for each wingsail (inner and outer panels excluding outrigger) is 75kg. This breaks down as: 30 kg, 15kg, 30kg for the main spar, bearings and secondary structure, respectfully.
Click on the wingsail spar image to view movie. |
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
| |
01 December
2009 |
An efficient layout has been found for the wingsail main bearings. Bearings are located at both ends of each inner wing panel. The bearings will be in the form of low profile angular contact bearings mounted in a face to face configuration. |
|
This minimises the change in diameter of the inner and outer carbon fibre tubes. The inner and outer tubes must be of the equivalent stiffness at the location of the bearings to prevent tilt misalignment of the bearings. |
|
| |
|
 |
|
| |
22 November
2009 |
Final structural format for the wingsails has been decided. The wingsails will have a unique structural layout, since it is essential that each wing panel has the equivalent structural characteristics of a single tubular spar, i.e. they have the same stiffness in all directions. This will prevent any shifting of the centre of lift under load, and prevent any unwanted tendencies for the wing panels to rotate. These requirements are brought about by the aerodynamic design of the wingsails. |
|
Stability and control is gained in a similar way to that of a tailless aircraft or flying wing without wing sweep (flying plank). Giving each wing panel the same structural characteristics as a single tubular spar is achieved by partially decoupling the secondary structure, i.e. ribs, membrane skins and secondary spars, from the main spar. The secondary structure is then prevented from contributing to the bending stiffness of the overall structure. |
|
| |
|
 |
|
| |
13 November
2009 |
Studying the structure of carbon fibre human powered aircraft wings have given us some really good ideas how to reduce weight of the wingsails. Clearly we are not going for such a fragile structure as a human powered aircraft, however, some of the unique solutions that have been found for achieving human powered flight can be put to use on the V-39 project. |
|
These include the use of very low density styrofoam sheeting for the wings to maintain an accurate airfoil under local aerodynamic loading. This sheeting will lie under mylar skins. The foam will not ripple as the structure bends. |
|
| |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|